🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include events where Black people are remunerated to speak with predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The surge has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has developed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the accounts of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a complete entity.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to erase Black history and experience from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration illustrates how little it can be influential if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just eliminate things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the history when it ignores the current situation of far-right rallies in the street? Establishments who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the risks that impact society if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.